13:30 #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-05-05 13:30 Meeting started Tue May 5 13:30:43 2020 UTC. The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 13:30 13:30 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 13:31 Roll call: didrocks, duflu (out), heather, jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, marcustomlinson (out), oSoMoN, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), callmepk 13:31 o/ 13:31 o/ 13:31 o/ 13:31 o/ 13:31 \o 13:31 o/ 13:31 |O| 13:31 wooot, let's get started 13:32 #topic rls-bb-bug 13:33 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:33 no desktop entry 13:33 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:33 everything assigned, wooot 13:34 I'm going to skip -ee from now on, I don't think it makes sense to accept new things for that serie at this point 13:34 makes sense 13:34 we can still on special cases but probably doesn't need to be in the meeting 13:34 #topic rls-ff-bug 13:34 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:35 there are some 'noise' item (incomplete/already discussed&assigned), I will skip those 13:35 bug #1876891 13:35 bug 1876891 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "The fractional scaling toggle applies instantly and not when "Apply" is pressed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876891 13:36 I think it's an issue we should fix but I wouldn't consider it as rls target 13:36 it's a pretty specific case to pick a scaled value and then turn scaling off while it's selected 13:37 and the impact is limited, scaling is wrong but you still have a display so it's easy enough to change the value in the UI 13:37 is it? 13:37 pick scaling, decide you don't want it, later want it again 13:37 let's say we didn't get any report so far 13:37 at that point you get the old value before you picked whatever you want at the new point 13:37 I'm not discussing it's a bug, agreed it's not a nice behaviour 13:38 it just didn't get reported/mentioned by other users yet and is easy to recover from 13:38 anyway, that's my reasoning for giving a -1 13:38 it seems like it should be fixed but maybe not super urgent 13:38 I'm happy to be overulled 13:38 here's what I think 13:38 it's crap behaviour 13:38 the problem is that we can't know the actual scaling value before activating it 13:38 i'd say we want it fixed for .1 13:38 and it's crap bugs that *we* introduced in a distro patch 13:38 we should have a high bar for quality there 13:38 so not really possible to do this... The only option is not to scale by default probably 13:39 so I think we should be holding ourselves to a high standard here and accepting things like this 13:39 Trevinho, well, from the settings the control could be smart enough to change the value to an int one before doing the gsettings toggling 13:39 Laney makes a good argument.. i'm switching sides 13:40 still, we don't have data showing that users noticed/that it's a thing people do 13:40 seb128: mh, *could* but it goes through the DBusAPI so need to be consequent, so may still cause some visual lag 13:40 anyway 13:40 vote? 13:40 -1 from me 13:40 +1 from me 13:40 by default it would pick an integer value though 13:40 only if the user changed it previously it's a fractional, and imho this is fine 13:41 +1 13:41 -1 13:41 +1 13:41 +1 13:41 k, nominating 13:41 kenvandine, do you think Robert can take on it since he added the UI? 13:41 and it's g-c-c 13:41 he's got other time sensitive stuff 13:42 but it might be a quick fix 13:42 unsure what would be a nice behaviour there 13:42 not sure, unless we want 3 clicks to get it active 13:42 I don't get why you have to fiddle with the value mutter knows about, it's just not connecting directly to the gsetting 13:42 maybe simply disabling the off switch if a scaled value is selected? 13:42 like -> toggle -> apply -> set scaling -> done 13:42 it's completely fine to remember the previous setting, just don't apply it until they press apply 13:43 so you can have a chance to change it 13:43 no way unless we implement changing monitor.xml from g-c-c 13:43 which isn't something we want 13:43 maybe should just disable the toggle if a scaled value is selected? 13:44 only option is to add other dbus APIs which I decided not to do not to move away from upstream 13:44 discuss after 13:44 right 13:44 yeah 13:44 hopefully without the 'no way' kind of things 13:45 bug #1876894 13:45 bug 1876894 in mutter (Ubuntu) "Scaling is not reverted properly (appears shrunk) when disabling fractional scaling" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876894 13:45 I vote +1 to this one 13:46 +1 13:46 +1 13:47 ah, wait... MIGHT be WONTFIX for some things unfortnuately... as it depends on their toolkits 13:47 like it's for qt (telegram) and sometimes firefox 13:47 hum? 13:47 same is already when you switch from 100% to 200% 13:47 for me it's 13:47 start session 13:47 it works if you first pick 100% and then press apply 13:47 -enable scaling, 125% 13:47 disable the key 13:48 and g-c-c is underscale 13:48 resolution is 3200 in xrandr 13:48 instead of 1900 13:48 pick 100% and it's fine 13:48 ah ok, that's fine then. g-c-c issue thouhg. 13:48 not mutter, I can look at that. 13:49 not g-c-c 13:50 anyway, let's talk about this after the meeting 13:50 k 13:50 I have an old laptop that hasn't been update for a while and I wanted to update it now, finding it's running 19.04 and nothing seems to want to update. Do I have to change repos? 13:51 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:51 bug #1866088 13:51 bug 1866088 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Focal) "Problems with the Dock setting of "Show on" in the Appearance tab" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866088 13:51 RoyK, we're in the middle of a team meeting here, hold on for a few minutes if you don't mind 13:52 that's fix commited 13:52 assigning to Marco, it's pending review in the focal queue 13:52 oSoMoN: np 13:53 bug #1876334 13:53 bug 1876334 in zsys (Ubuntu Focal) "[Focal] zsys does not clear out old snapshots, potentially filling up bpool" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1876334 13:55 jibel, you nominated that one, should be assigned to you or Didier? 13:56 assuming they will :p 13:56 #topic rls-gg-bug 13:56 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-gg-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:57 no new bug on that list, either discussed or things to clean out as I said earlier 13:57 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-gg-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:57 fix commited ones 13:57 #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:58 Laney, want to do that one or should I? (I review the list earlier so I can do if you are not on top of it atm) 13:58 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:58 I didn't look, feel free 13:58 k 13:58 fonts-teluguvijayam: needs a MIR 13:58 I will do that, standard/easy font one 13:59 some libreoffice issues, hopefully only usual armhf retries, some are queued let's see next week if it's still an issue 13:59 libutempter needs investigating, I was going to poke at it 13:59 gdk-pixbuf is failing but the tests are new / just been added in Debian 13:59 the failures don't happen in Debian thoguh 13:59 anyone interested to poke at that? 14:00 libsoxr is a bit puzzling, it failed in focal and now again, failing to find pkg-config on i386, but it has one successful try on groovy which I don't explain 14:01 it looks like it's not set up for crossbuild, dunno how it worked that one time :/ 14:01 gdk-pixbuf: can do once I'm done with the firefox release and other things 14:01 oSoMoN, thanks 14:01 I will trello cards thing for reminder 14:02 libsoxr would be nice to make cross build friendly if anyone want to poke, but meanwhile I mp a hint to reset the result on i386 I think 14:02 it's not a regression 14:02 a 14:02 and that's it for proposed migration 14:02 #topic AOB 14:02 any other topic? 14:03 some items were mentioned on one of the incoming lists which we keep skipping 14:03 anything we can do to get those off? 14:05 yes, I will get them off for next week, I had delayed assuming the .2 upload would clear off the list for us 14:05 but that is taking time, we should probably just accept nomination for things pending upload to get them off the list 14:05 cool thanks! 14:06 np! 14:06 yeah I usually nominate and assign when uploading SRUs 14:06 for all the bugs fixed in that 14:06 right 14:06 thanks for pointing it out :) 14:06 anything else? 14:06 not from me 14:07 (sorry, got some ping/side discussion going which created a bit of delay on the meeting) 14:07 thanks everyone! 14:07 #endmeeting