== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-desktop: Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-02-11, 11 Feb at 14:30 — 15:09 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2020/ubuntu-desktop.2020-02-11-14.30.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === rls-ff-bugs === The discussion about "rls-ff-bugs" started at 14:33. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html === rls-ee-bugs === The discussion about "rls-ee-bugs" started at 14:45. === rls-bb-bugs === The discussion about "rls-bb-bugs" started at 14:51. === update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages === The discussion about "update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages" started at 14:52. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libreoffice === aob === The discussion about "aob" started at 14:58. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/versions.html not really * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/gnome.html maybe that's a better one to look at == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * kenvandine (43) * Laney (19) * hellsworth (15) * marcustomlinson (12) * oSoMoN (5) * meetingology (3) * mitya57 (2) * ubot5 (1) * didrocks (1) * jibel (1) * RikMills (1) == Full Log == 14:30 #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-02-11 14:30 Meeting started Tue Feb 11 14:30:07 2020 UTC. The chair is kenvandine. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:30 14:30 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 14:30 Roll call: didrocks, duflu (out), jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney (out), marcustomlinson, oSoMoN, seb128 (out), tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), Wimpress (out), hellsworth 14:30 \o 14:30 o/ 14:30 oh, i'm not sure if seb128 is out :) 14:31 o/ 14:31 he is 14:31 hey 14:31 ok 14:31 meanwhile seb128 watches from the bushes fighting the urge to speak and give away his location 14:31 :) 14:33 let's get started 14:33 #topic rls-ff-bugs 14:33 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:34 oh weird... i can't open the bug links in firefox 14:34 i get a dialog asking to download it 14:35 file a bug :) 14:35 :) 14:35 I see a lot of duflu on those open bugs 14:36 restarting the browser fixed it 14:36 turning it off and on again… 14:36 yeah, lots of duflu 14:38 oh I see, these are mostly champagne additions 14:38 all actually 14:38 Daniel seems to be adding champagne to lots of bugs 14:38 not sure that's how this is supposed to work 14:39 indeed 14:39 de-tag those and follow up with a mail to the team(s) explaining it? 14:41 it might still follow the spirit of champagne 14:41 let's discuss this again in the leads meeting 14:41 before de-tagging 14:42 seriously hope it doesn't 14:43 well, these could have been tagged by finding the same issue and tagging the existing bug instead of filing new 14:44 looks like tracking is fine 14:45 moving on 14:45 #topic rls-ee-bugs 14:45 nothing desktop in incoming 14:46 bug 1853768 is in tracking but not assigned 14:46 bug 1853768 in yaru-theme (Ubuntu Eoan) "Qt apps, like kid3-qt, which uses legacy icons "document-*.png", show them as normal document icon under Yaru theme" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853768 14:47 says its fixed in focal 14:47 yeah, but eoan needs the SRU 14:48 that's the only one not assigned 14:48 besides the NM bug 14:50 Trevinho: https://code.launchpad.net/~rikmills/unity/+git/unity/+merge/378891 14:50 kenvandine: I wanted to take care of SRUing it, but I'm waiting for the current yaru-theme in eoan-proposed to migrate. 14:50 mitya57: can we assign it to you? 14:50 Yes 14:50 thanks 14:50 moving on 14:51 #topic rls-bb-bugs 14:51 nothing for desktop incoming 14:52 only un-assigned bugs in tracking are NM 14:52 #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 14:52 Laney: you're up 14:53 Don't have super much to say, could someone take a look at the regressions underneath gobject-introspection maybe? 14:55 and there's a libreoffice regression noted there, not sure if that's something to be concerned with 14:55 otherwise python3-defaults is making it look sad but that's not on us to handle 14:55 marcustomlinson: libreoffice shouldn't be blocking python3 anymore since the LO ubuntu4 deb is in proposed? 14:55 yeah fingers crossed that'll be sorted out soon 14:55 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libreoffice 14:55 tests running 14:56 no volunteers for gobject-introspection? 14:57 here's a rubbish suggestion, how about we just hit retry on all the failures 14:57 * marcustomlinson runs away 14:58 * marcustomlinson is sort of serious though 14:58 i'm full with LO and gnome snapcraft extension 14:58 i wish i could help but i'm already trying not to drown 14:58 ok, moving on 14:58 #topic aob 14:59 nothing from me 15:00 gnome updates 15:01 it would be good if people could volunteer to do a couple of these to spread it around a bit 15:01 i guess we didn't make good progress since last week? 15:02 https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/versions.html not really 15:02 Laney what has to be done with these to update them? 15:04 wrangling the packaging 15:04 i need more specifics 15:04 i see libreoffice in that list. what do i need to do to that to "wrangle the packaging" 15:04 yeah sorry, but it's hard to be specific 15:04 I'm late on feature work and trying to stay afloat, but I'll make some room for some updates this week 15:05 basically get the package, check what changed between the version we have and the new one, and adjust accordingly 15:05 adding / updating build-dependencies, stuff like that 15:05 https://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/gnome.html maybe that's a better one to look at 15:05 is there any documentation on this process? 15:05 dropping or rebasing ubuntu-specific patches on top of upstream/debian 15:05 hellsworth: we don't follow rc releases from Debian in libreoffice, so ignore it 15:06 oooh these packages are out of date with respect to debian and you're asking for them to be updated 15:06 the high level goal is to get gnome 3.35.90 into focal 15:07 debian or upstream 15:07 working towards the gnome RC 15:07 all of these packages have gnome 3.35.90 in the debian or upstream package? 15:07 there's some documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/git https://wiki.debian.org/Gnome/Git https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/ 15:08 Laney: thanks but i think i understand now 15:08 ok, moving on 15:08 usually it's us (& endless folks, & some others) who do the update in Debian too 15:08 any more aob? 15:09 (thanks oSoMoN!) 15:09 i'll try updating one sometime in the near future 15:09 well that's a wrap 15:09 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)