== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-desktop: Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-01-07, 07 Jan at 14:30 — 14:58 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2020/ubuntu-desktop.2020-01-07-14.30.log.html]] == Meeting summary == === rls-bb-bugs === The discussion about "rls-bb-bugs" started at 14:32. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html === rls-ee-bugs === The discussion about "rls-ee-bugs" started at 14:38. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-tracking-bug-tasks.html === rls-ff-bugs === The discussion about "rls-ff-bugs" started at 14:39. * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html * ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-tracking-bug-tasks.html === update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages === The discussion about "update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages" started at 14:40. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-smc-gayathri/+bug/1858620 === AOB === The discussion about "AOB" started at 14:52. == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * seb128 (78) * hellsworth (22) * Laney (22) * cpaelzer (17) * kenvandine (7) * ubot5 (5) * oSoMoN (3) * meetingology (3) * tjaalton (1) == Full Log == 14:30 #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2020-01-07 14:30 Meeting started Tue Jan 7 14:30:40 2020 UTC. The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:30 14:30 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 14:31 Roll call: didrocks (off), duflu (off), heather, jamesh, jibel, kenvandine, laney, marcustomlinson (out), oSoMoN, tkamppeter (out), trevinho, robert_ancell (out) 14:31 o/ 14:31 happy 2020, I hope everyone had nice holidays 14:31 o/ 14:31 yo 14:31 \o 14:32 k, let's get started 14:32 #topic rls-bb-bugs 14:32 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:32 bug #1854363 14:32 bug 1854363 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "[upstream] Typo in thunderbird code prevents central configuration" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1854363 14:32 that's a regression for the update uploaded to security before the holidays, I tagged it 14:33 it's not going to impact most users but still it's a LTS regression and has been reported 14:33 I vote +1 to accept it :) 14:33 sounds reasonable 14:33 oSoMoN, thx 14:34 since we have the maintainer agreement, let's move on! 14:34 bug #1855893 14:34 bug 1855893 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "Properly let PCM leave suspended state when hardware doesn't support PCM resume" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1855893 14:35 it's an oem team request and seems reasonable 14:35 I vote +1 to accept it 14:35 other opinions? 14:35 seems like a reasonable suggestion 14:35 +1 14:36 thx, moving on then 14:36 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html 14:37 the only unassigned one are the NMs ones we said we would discuss in another meeting but didn't do yet 14:37 I'm going to skip that 14:37 I'm also going to skip disco at this point, doesn't make sense to upload new SRUs for that serie now 14:38 #topic rls-ee-bugs 14:38 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:38 no desktop entries 14:38 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-tracking-bug-tasks.html 14:39 some leftover triaging, I will deal with those after the meeting 14:39 #topic rls-ff-bugs 14:39 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:39 no desktop ones 14:40 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-tracking-bug-tasks.html 14:40 only n-m there as well to triage 14:40 #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 14:40 update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 14:40 ups 14:40 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 14:40 Laney, your turn 14:41 thx 14:41 one second, browser is being sad 14:42 ok 14:42 there's a few for tjaalton in there, assuming those are being handled or will be after this ping ;-) 14:43 so evolution-data-server (ftbfs) fonts-smc (mir?) brotli (i386 something) libxcb (something) pcsc-lite (dunno) 14:43 I did the font MIR this morning 14:44 I can do libxcb it's another test that need crossarch use of pkg-config/gcc 14:44 that looks like the normal thing 14:44 what do you do about the ones that are here because of regressions? 14:44 I will take the brotli one and ping LocutusOfBorg about pcsc-lite since he synced it 14:44 do they sit here until the regressions have been fixed? 14:44 yeah 14:45 but those xorg/mesa ones are for Timo 14:45 I would argue e-d-s should be fixed by vorlon since he broke it by doing i386 hacks, I will ping him 14:45 ok, I didn't know if he just got unlucky being the next uploader 14:45 tjaalton, ^ please confirm that you at looking at those 14:45 already did ping him a second ago, no need to pile on 14:46 anyway someone pls take the font one 14:46 k 14:46 I did the font MIR this morning 14:46 i'll take a look at fonts-smc 14:46 oh right 14:46 ah cool thx 14:46 what about pcsc-lite? 14:46 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-smc-gayathri/+bug/1858620 14:46 Ubuntu bug 1858620 in fonts-smc-gayathri (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fonts-smc-gayathri" [Undecided,New] 14:46 I was going to ping the person who synced it and see if they will look 14:46 makes sense 14:47 if you hit a dead end with that person, i'm happy to take a look 14:47 sounds like we are good for this round then 14:47 i wanted to mention libmail-dkim-perl 14:47 oh, snapd-glib ftbfs also, unsure if that's for Robert 14:47 seb128: if you mean xserver/mesa/glvnd landing on focal, yes 14:47 tjaalton, thx 14:48 seb128: looks like a flaky test in snapd-glib 14:48 kenvandine, maybe retry it then? 14:48 i kicked a rebuild a few minutes ago and it looks like it passed 14:48 ah ok 14:48 nice 14:48 both libmail-authenticationresults-perl and libscalar-list-utils-perl ahve been looked at by the security team and suggest they are accepted. i'm not sure what further steps there are to actually get them in. 14:48 well... "nice" 14:48 hate flaky tests 14:48 right 14:48 file a bug about it? 14:49 in general I don't look at those greyed out ones, (1) in case things sort themselves out, (2) to give people a chance to do it themselves without being hassled 14:49 @perl MIR, it looks like the MIR team/cpaelzer were fine with those 14:49 looks like people don't agree with that policy? 14:50 seb128: right so what's the next step to get them into main? 14:50 ? 14:50 but maybe ping cpaelzer about it on #ubuntu-devel just to know if he consider those as +1 now 14:50 cpaelzer, sorry, I forgot you were there :) 14:50 I'm trying to be everywhere 14:51 * Laney looks under the sofa 14:51 trying to ... 14:51 cpaelzer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmail-authenticationresults-perl/+bug/1853175 got a +1 from security team, we were wondering if that need to bounce back to you to gave the final +1 next? 14:51 Ubuntu bug 1853175 in libmail-authenticationresults-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmail-authenticationresults-perl" [Undecided,New] 14:51 checking ... 14:51 cpaelzer, and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libscalar-list-utils-perl/+bug/1854849 14:51 Ubuntu bug 1854849 in libscalar-list-utils-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libscalar-list-utils-perl" [Undecided,New] 14:51 thx 14:51 k 14:51 Laney, I think we can call it done for that section of the meeting? 14:51 cpaelzer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libscalar-list-utils-perl/+bug/1854849 too 14:52 ok 14:52 thx 14:52 @topic AOB 14:52 #topic AOB 14:52 would be good to consider my previous comment 14:52 anything else to discuss today? 14:52 seb128: Both had the MIR Team ack already 14:52 Laney, sorry I didn't see your question earlier, crossed discussions 14:52 Laney: I agree that the grey ones might sort themselves out so not looking at them until they become bold makes sense to me 14:52 seb128: and if we wollow the little state chart onhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam#Process_states 14:53 that means after security ack (which we got) they are good to go 14:53 If the changes are already in proposed that pulls things in "Fxi Committed" 14:53 cpaelzer, k, that chart has them as "fix commited" when they are good o go so I was unsure 14:53 if the changes are not there yet "In Progress" 14:54 oh ok thank you very much! 14:54 security Team doesn't want to change states, so we have to clean them up after their reviewed most of the time 14:54 Laney, but yeah, ignoring the grey ones makes sense to me 14:54 they are often in flux indeed 14:54 cpaelzer, k, which is what made me unsure/to ping :) 14:54 well done :-) 14:54 cpaelzer, thx for clarifying 14:55 hellsworth: so set the state whatever matches the current upload state 14:55 and once things show up in component-mismatches (which might be now already) get the attention of your favourite AA 14:55 what is an AA? 14:55 sorry, i'm new here :) 14:55 archive admin 14:56 thanks kenvandine 14:56 k 14:56 they can execute the move to main 14:56 ok 14:56 hellsworth: from this chat the closest AA to ask might be seb128 :-) 14:56 right :) 14:56 oh ok cool :) 14:56 I will have a look after the meeting 14:56 any other topic? 14:56 my favorite AA :) 14:56 oh meeting - then sorry to interrupt - cpaelzer out 14:57 lol 14:57 cpaelzer, to be fair we are the ones who summoned you :) 14:57 thx for responding/helping us to get those MIRs sorted out! 14:57 ok made them fix committed. thanks for the advice, yall 14:57 only because I try to get under Laneys couch to scare him 14:57 and it looks like we have no other topic for the meeting, so let's wrap now 14:57 thanks everyone! 14:57 thanks! 14:58 thanks 14:58 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)