13:32 #startmeeting Desktop Team Meeting - 2019-06-11 13:32 Meeting started Tue Jun 11 13:32:43 2019 UTC. The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 13:32 13:32 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 13:33 s/the hub/discourse/ 🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊 13:33 Roll call: didrocks, duflu (out), jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, marcustomlinson, oSoMoN, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out) 13:33 \o 13:33 o/ 13:34 o/ 13:35 ok, let's get started 13:35 #topic rls-bb-bugs 13:35 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:35 empty 13:36 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:37 out of the ones we already discussed previous week and that still need sorting out 13:37 bug #1786344 13:37 bug 1786344 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Default IBus input method ignored in live session" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1786344 13:37 Gunnar nominated this one 13:37 I don't think it has enough heat to be rls tracked 13:38 I suggest assigning to Gunnar and deleting the bionic specific target 13:38 he can still pursue the SRUing 13:38 👍🏻 13:39 k, next 13:39 bug # 13:39 bug #1734887 13:39 bug 1734887 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu Cosmic) "No caps lock indicator on login screen" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1734887 13:40 Trevinho, ^ do you think that is going to land in 3.30 serie? 13:40 let me see 13:41 does that affect whether we consider it rls? 13:42 I don't know 13:42 I think we can propose a cherry pick in case. 13:42 hum, /me ponders 13:42 * Laney thinks not 13:42 either we want to fix it or we don't 13:42 right 13:42 indeed if we consider important we can still do ourself 13:42 I think it would be nice to fix 13:42 but probably not important enough to be rls targetted 13:43 a list of nice to have if upstream agrees let's say 13:43 k, let's untarget it? 13:43 yes 13:43 thx 13:43 dunno why duflu is still doing that, did someone have a word? 13:43 I prepare the cherry pick anyways we'll see if it lands 13:44 I mentioned it to him, will do again 13:44 thx 13:44 that's it for bionic 13:44 #topic rls-cc-bugs 13:45 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:45 no desktop entry 13:45 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:45 nothing to discuss, still the era thing unsorted and that capslock one 13:45 #topic rls-dd-bugs 13:45 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:45 no desktop entry 13:46 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:46 same, nothing new 13:46 #topic rls-ee-bugs 13:46 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html 13:47 the cups one was discussed previous week but I had forgotten to edit post meeting, done now 13:47 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-tracking-bug-tasks.html 13:47 nothing unassigned there 13:47 #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:47 https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages 13:48 tkamppeter, kenvandine, what's the status of sorting out the n-m autopkgtest regression post removal of those deprecated libs? 13:49 I'll check with Till, he's out today 13:49 thx 13:50 oSoMoN, the libreoffice one is something on your list? 13:50 I made a card for it 13:50 maybe check there first if you're going to be leading this section? 13:50 there's this one test that's become flaky in eoan, it needs investigating 13:50 k 13:50 in the meantime I’ve triggered a new test run 13:50 Laney, sorry, I didn't intend to "lead", I just though it would be the same as previous week so I asked directly about the n-m status 13:51 then there was 1 left, it seemed pointless to ask you to ask about that one only 13:51 thx for making the card, I try to be aware/handle that part better next time 13:51 ok, well I usually make the cards around meeting time, for reference 13:51 http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libr/libreoffice/eoan/s390x 13:51 noted 13:51 that doesn't obviously say "flaky" to me by the way 13:52 more like new openjdk-lts might have impacted it 13:52 maybe we get lucky though 13:52 doookoooo 13:52 :p 13:52 but yeah, needs investigating 13:52 Laney, look at older failures 13:52 thx oSoMoN Laney 13:52 seb128: or like tdaitx ;-) 13:52 I mean I see a few crosses 13:52 what do you mean? 13:52 anyway, if it's flaky... 13:52 .... 13:53 it shouldn't be 13:53 indeed 13:53 I'm filing a bug to not forget about it 13:53 cool 13:53 :) 13:54 there's a card too, such tracking 13:54 good, that's it for that section then 13:54 #topic AOB 13:54 other topics? 13:54 if a kind AA (not me) from ubuntu-desktop team could review grubzfs-testsuite, that would be awesome :) 13:54 (ok, there is just one candidate matching that description :p) 13:55 kind?!?!?!? 13:55 ahah 13:55 😈 13:55 * Laney slaps self 13:55 lol 13:55 * seb128 gets the hint 13:56 didrocks, will do 13:56 thx ;) 13:56 other topics? ;) 13:56 network-manager on bionic, gnome-shell on disco 13:56 are those well handled (particularly the first one) or do people need help? 13:56 should we organize for guadec? 13:56 g-s is fine 13:57 kenvandine, can you speak about n-m/bionic since Till is out? what's the status of unblocking that one? 13:58 Trevinho: false positive or you have a fix or what? 13:58 Laney: I've already submitted a fix for that 13:58 * Laney is getting daily spam emails from Brian 13:59 merged to master, 3.30 is a bit different diff so done other pick 13:59 Trevinho, we need another upload with the fix then? 13:59 3.32 branch? 13:59 might be the case to do our patching only 13:59 yeah sorry 14:00 go bug for reviews, if no luck we can distro patch 14:00 imho 14:00 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/607/ 14:00 seb128: last week Till verified the split DNS issue was fixed with the systemd update in bionic 14:01 if you want to help with reviews... 14:01 kenvandine, that's the systemd part but doesn't address the n-m regressions that leaded to have -updates reverted, right? 14:02 Trevinho: thx 14:02 i think he's still trying to understand the regression 14:03 k 14:03 but yeah, it feels like we don't have a good handle on this one 14:03 seb128: so to answer, yes. although IMHO is quite low priority 14:03 unsure how we can unblock it 14:03 is something happening on shutdown 14:03 it's blocking the SRU from being offered to people 14:03 Trevinho, well, "low priority", our current SRU is blocked from reaching users until that's sorted out 14:04 or reload... which would be anyways covered by session 14:04 sure, sure... I'm saying from the bug point of view. indeed I fixed it promptly because of that... 14:04 if you believe that's a non issue for users and should be unflagged please talk to Brian about it asking him to do that 14:05 I'll go ping in #gnome-shell if Marco is too shy :-) 14:05 thx! 14:05 I am :-) 14:05 k, that should be it for now on those I guess 14:05 other topics? 14:06 30 seconds 14:06 as for guadec? 14:06 seems like an internal one 14:06 yeah 14:07 but you are right, let me try to get that ball rolling 14:07 cool 14:07 but we don't need the team for it, so let's wrap 14:07 we can address it internally indeed.... just as a reminder ;-) 14:07 #endmeeting