== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-desktop: Desktop Team Meeting - 2019-03-12, 12 Mar at 14:35 — 15:11 UTC * Full logs at [[http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2019/ubuntu-desktop.2019-03-12-14.35.log.html]] == Meeting summary == ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html ''LINK:'' http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1818246 ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1818790 ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/1818878 ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1819207 ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1819126 ''LINK:'' http://launchpad.net/bugs/1819572 ''LINK:'' https://trello.com/c/kEcqB34L/257-appstream-0125-1-to-0126-1 <- that got marked as in progress with nobody assigned, and hasn't moved since then ''LINK:'' https://trello.com/c/mWodrc3o/256-libvorbis-blocking-build-essential-125ubuntu2-to-126ubuntu1-for-4-days that never got assigned (but apparently someone else fixed it, so lucked out) === AOB === The discussion about "AOB" started at 15:08. == Vote results == == Done items == * (none) == People present (lines said) == * willcooke (71) * seb128 (67) * Laney (40) * didrocks (18) * kenvandine (12) * Trevinho (10) * ubot5 (8) * tseliot (4) * meetingology (3) * oSoMoN (2) * andyrock (1) * jibel (1) == Full Log == 14:35 #startmeeting Desktop Team Meeting - 2019-03-12 14:35 Meeting started Tue Mar 12 14:35:04 2019 UTC. The chair is willcooke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:35 14:35 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 14:35 \o 14:35 o/ 14:35 hey 14:35 hey 14:35 \o 14:35 Roll call: Description:andyrock, dgadomski, didrocks, duflu (out), jbicha, jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, oSoMoN, seb128, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out) 14:35 o/ 14:36 o/ 14:36 Ok, as usual we will start with the Incoming bugs review, starting with B 14:36 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:36 Ha, or not. Since B incoming is empty! 14:36 \o/ 14:37 I sent the B tracking list round, please look at it and see what's against you which might need looking at 14:37 o/ 14:37 C incoming is also clear \o/ 14:37 D incoming has some, so let's look: 14:37 http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html 14:38 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1818246 14:38 Ubuntu bug 1818246 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "update-notifier's notification is huge due to large icon" [High,Confirmed] 14:38 I haven't seen this one, so I dont know how common it is 14:38 that was supposed to have been investigated in the past week 14:38 forgot who though 14:38 didrocks did investigate and get a testcase 14:38 Was it didrocks perhaps? 14:38 yep 14:38 it got turned into an assert/crasher in .92 14:38 then, it became a crash :) 14:39 which got fixed in master 14:39 which is fixed upstream 14:39 and now, I need to retest the testcase once uploaded 14:39 but I don't know if once the crasher is fixed the initial problem is 14:39 exactly :) 14:39 would have been good to keep the bug updated imho (feedback for future) 14:39 waiting for 3.32 g-s to be out I guess 14:39 out/uploaded 14:39 yep 14:39 it is 14:40 oki, didrocks would you comment on the bug to that effect? And we can look again next week? 14:40 yes, FTR I opened the crashers and referenced this bug already 14:40 ah cool, thanks 14:40 doing the other way aroudn 14:40 +1 to accept the nomination 14:40 not sure about punting things in incoming like this, it feels weird to me 14:40 btw 14:40 yes 14:41 kk, I targetted 14:41 and assigned didrocks 14:41 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1818790 14:41 Ubuntu bug 1818790 in mutter (Ubuntu) "[regression] Desktop zoom is missing the mouse pointer" [High,Triaged] 14:42 +1 to nominate, assign Marco 14:42 yep 14:42 from the channel backlog I got that it was being worked on already 14:42 yes, fix submitted already 14:42 upstream 14:43 done 14:44 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/1818878 14:44 Ubuntu bug 1818878 in yaru-theme (Ubuntu) "System menu user icon is bigger than others in 3.31.92" [High,Triaged] 14:44 i wonder if that is in any way related to the user image in gdm 14:44 fixed in next yaru 14:44 not rls imho, but it's going to be fixed 14:44 no 14:44 but that is also fixed 14:44 i noticed yesterday that my face is HUGE in gdm 14:44 kenvandine: that's another shell one 14:44 blame Marco :) 14:44 fixed as well 14:45 no need to panic or even discuss 14:45 great :) 14:45 agreed 14:45 no, blame others! 14:45 so just untag then? 14:45 rls-dd-notfixing, but it will be fixed later today probably anyway 14:45 either way is fine imho 14:45 even not touching 14:45 it should be cleared by the next meeting 14:45 done 14:46 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1819207 14:46 Ubuntu bug 1819207 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Add Modaliases to open-vm-tools-desktop to allow automatic installation by ubuntu-drivers" [High,In progress] 14:46 but yeah, rls-dd-notfixing, even it feels weird -notfixing a thing which is fix pending upload 14:46 yeah, the rls bit is the key 14:46 willcooke, up to you to decide for that one how much a cycle goal it is 14:46 I'm +1 on that open-vm-toosl 14:46 why's it rls? 14:46 either -notfixing or nominate/assign according to what you think imho 14:47 but whatever, jibel seemed to be working with cpaelzer on that 14:47 You're right though, it's not a rls bug 14:47 Laney, management decision to make it a team goal 14:47 well 14:47 anyway, either is fine with me 14:47 maintainer +1 to open-vm-tools 14:48 I think that "needs to get done this cycle" decided by $manager qualitfy to be rls targetted 14:48 well, u-d-c maintainer ;) 14:48 tseliot, thx for the reviews on that topic btw :) 14:48 :) 14:48 I think not, that kind of bug should be tracked directly and not in the team meeting 14:48 maybe a discussion for another time 14:49 yeah, let's talk about this sort of thing later, and move on. That bug will get fixed 14:49 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1819126 14:49 Ubuntu bug 1819126 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT [St:ERROR:../src/st/st-image-content.c:155:st_image_content_get_preferred_size: assertion failed (priv->width > -1): (-1 > -1)]" [High,Fix committed] 14:50 already fix committed 14:50 right 14:50 that's the counter part of Didier's one 14:50 yep 14:50 should be fixed in g-s 3.32 which has been uploaded to disco now 14:51 if the other one is accepted, then should this one too? 14:51 well, doesnt really matter, and that can be tagged on to the conversation about what gets rls tagged later 14:51 sure, I didn't close it in the changelog so someone can do that after verifying 14:51 last one then: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1796606 14:51 Ubuntu bug 1796606 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in st_widget_get_theme_node → ffi_call_unix64 → ffi_call → gjs_invoke_c_function → function_call" [Undecided,Confirmed] 14:52 Laney: hum, this is not a SRU, but weird to not have referenced it on purpose 14:52 this is going to be fixed in .1 14:52 well, fixed... Muted :) 14:52 those patches are in the upload 14:52 so already fixed 14:52 didrocks: I just forgot / didn't know which bugs to close, so not really on purpose 14:52 lovely Laney 14:52 Laney: ah ok, makes more sense thus 14:53 :> 14:53 ok sorted 14:54 Right, that is the end of the rls bugs 14:54 we still have some accepted & not assigned ones 14:54 let's look at errors.u.c next, and then proposed migrations last 14:54 (sorry) 14:54 seb128, do we? 14:55 let's tidy that up then 14:55 DD looks right to me now 14:55 I think there are new ones, like the rhythmbox crash (but it was perhaps already acked without going through -incoming), desktop langs on the install… unsure if those were listed 14:56 didrocks, those are assigned? 14:56 yeah, but were they on -incoming and then accepted outside of this meeting? 14:56 willcooke, http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html has bug #1819572 14:56 bug 1819572 in network-manager (Ubuntu Disco) "do-release-upgrade from cosmic to disco make the network of this specific machine malfunction" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1819572 14:56 I thought this meeting was to review -incoming -> ack/not ack for release 14:57 didrocks, we review things suggested, but it's fine to have things decided by team and/or management and directly targetted&assigned outside the meeting 14:57 if it's a management decision to target there is no much to discuss 14:57 ok, so the team assignements here are not the only assignements 14:58 just making this clear 14:58 well, the -tracking list are a reflect of what is accepted 14:58 the only one in the DD list which is unassigned is: 14:58 http://launchpad.net/bugs/1819572 14:58 Ubuntu bug 1819572 in network-manager (Ubuntu Disco) "do-release-upgrade from cosmic to disco make the network of this specific machine malfunction" [Undecided,New] 14:58 ack 14:58 which I dont know anything about. I will ask them 14:58 hahah 14:59 weird, says it only affects the one machine 14:59 I vote -notfixing 14:59 I think they targetted it without knowing what the implications are 14:59 I'll sort it out 14:59 thx 15:00 Launchpad recently changed so that nominating doesn't happen any more 15:00 that's the only one though seb128? 15:00 everyone who could nominate can now target directly 15:00 so I expect more of this kind of thing 15:00 ah 15:00 fun 15:00 willcooke, yes 15:00 oh joy 15:00 Laney, do you know if that was discussed somewhere public? 15:00 ok, so lets now really move on to errors.u.c 15:00 k 15:00 discussed not sure, I saw a post about that somewhere 15:00 that is going to be frustrating 15:00 can't remember where though, sorry awbout that 15:01 np 15:01 I haven't pre-filtered the e.u.c list and I used all the time in the previous meeting to talk about other stuff... so 15:01 my comment from previous week still stand 15:02 I think e.u.c should have reports converted to bug and going to the rls-incoming process as appropriate 15:02 that makes sense, just needs to be done 15:02 (far enough in advance of the meeting that the page has refreshed) 15:02 oki, then let's do that tomorrow seb128? You & I, and anyone else who wants in 15:02 I'm fine doing that starting next week 15:02 I can do it weekly on mondays 15:02 so we have those in place on the rls incoming on time 15:02 seb128: awesome 15:02 willcooke, k 15:03 well let's discuss the details later if you want 15:03 Do you want to do it in a HO, or would you prefer to do it alone at your convenience? 15:03 let's discuss together after the meeting 15:03 roger roger 15:03 bye bye will 15:03 :) 15:03 he bailed on us 15:03 Laney, I guess you can do proposed migration :) 15:04 wb willcooke 15:04 roger roger == /quit 15:04 there are some things https://trello.com/b/RHiGQXZJ/ubuntu-desktop-1904-cycle?menu=filter&filter=label:proposed-migration 15:04 I'm a bit concerned about the assignment process for that 15:04 seem to have found a secret key shortcut for quit 15:04 oh, ctrl-q 15:04 https://trello.com/c/kEcqB34L/257-appstream-0125-1-to-0126-1 <- that got marked as in progress with nobody assigned, and hasn't moved since then 15:05 https://trello.com/c/mWodrc3o/256-libvorbis-blocking-build-essential-125ubuntu2-to-126ubuntu1-for-4-days that never got assigned (but apparently someone else fixed it, so lucked out) 15:05 We should probably assign them now then. I expect last week we said "lets do it later" and then forgot 15:05 or we were supposed to do it in the manager meeting, and didnt have time 15:05 yeah, that ^ 15:06 another reason we need to move that meeting to wednesday 15:06 oki, seb128 shall we look at that too later on? 15:06 yeah 15:06 yeahg 15:06 so we can act on follow up from the team meeting 15:06 +1 15:06 can I move appstream back to backlog? 15:06 wfm 15:07 thanks 15:07 jbicha did file it upstream, it's a regression due to the glib hashtable/order change 15:07 managers meeting moved 15:07 which ximion said he would look at 15:07 sure 15:07 but yeah, should have an owner 15:07 but someone in the team should have ownership 15:07 if ximion does it, lucky for them 15:07 right 15:08 end of section 15:08 ok, thanks Laney 15:08 #topic AOB 15:08 Anyone got anything they want to talk about? 15:08 jbicha, ricotz, who is looking at the fallout from the new vala? 15:08 we have things that fail to build in disco due to it 15:08 like libunity or rygel 15:08 need to run to the train platform, back in a minute 15:09 nope 15:09 Laney, good luck 15:09 willcooke, jbicha put a note in his summary to discuss default windows placement 15:09 unsure if we should discuss that on the hub rather than the meeting though? 15:09 especially that it's something others care about, like the yaru team 15:10 hub sounds good, or at least out of the meeting 15:10 which might not be here 15:10 +1 15:10 jbicha, can you start a thread on the hub as a starting point, and we can take it from there 15:10 any more? 15:10 not from me 15:10 5...# 15:11 4.. 15:11 3...2...1... 15:11 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)