14:30 <seb128> #startmeeting Desktop Team Meeting 2019-02-12
14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Feb 12 14:30:28 2019 UTC.  The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
14:30 <meetingology> 
14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
14:30 <seb128> Roll call: andyrock, didrocks, duflu (out), jbicha, jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, oSoMoN, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out)
14:30 <andyrock> o/
14:30 <didrocks> hey hey o/
14:31 <tseliot> o/
14:31 <kenvandine> \o
14:31 <Trevinho> helloo
14:31 <oSoMoN> 👽/
14:31 <seb128> tseliot, tjaalton, sorry, I copied the list from previous week and seems that didn't include you
14:31 <seb128> k, look like we have most of the team, let's get started
14:32 <seb128> #topic rls bugs
14:32 <seb128> the incoming lists
14:32 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html
14:32 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-incoming-bug-tasks.html
14:32 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html
14:33 <seb128> bb has no desktop entry (also good to see that page small, is that a bug or a result of foundations finally dealing with their tagged bugs?)
14:33 <seb128> cc has no desktop entry
14:33 <Trevinho> I think bug 1772811 is already targetted
14:34 <ubot5> bug 1772811 in OEM Priority Project "different behaviors for switch display mode between xenial and bionic" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1772811
14:34 <seb128> that's the disco one
14:34 <seb128> Trevinho, can you assign it to yourself?
14:34 <andyrock> it's because it's not assigned in mutter
14:35 <seb128> right
14:35 <Trevinho> ok
14:35 <seb128> easy to fix, thx Marco
14:35 <seb128> tracking lists
14:36 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html
14:36 <seb128> so same one we just discussed
14:36 <seb128> bug #1767660
14:36 <ubot5> bug 1767660 in libinput (Ubuntu Bionic) "Regression 16.04 LTS to 18.04 LTS: Contour Design RollerMouse double click button no longer results in a double click event" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1767660
14:37 <seb128> tjaalton, ^ opinion on that one?
14:38 <seb128> to be it doesn't seem important enough to use team tracking
14:38 <seb128> it doesn't prevent people to work on it/SRU
14:38 <seb128> I vote -wontfix
14:38 <seb128> other opinions?
14:38 <seb128> -notfixing I mean
14:39 <Laney> sure, don't know if that works for accepted bugs though, might have to won't fix the task
14:39 <seb128> right, that's a bit annoying
14:39 <seb128> do we still have that launchpad bug that if I delete the bionic line we can't add it back ever?
14:40 <jbicha> you can add it back
14:40 <Laney> dunno
14:40 <seb128> k, let me delete the line then and tag
14:40 <Laney> no opinion on whether that's better or worse than closing the bug task
14:40 <Laney> seems you prefer that, so fine
14:41 <jbicha> it's annoying that LP doesn't show fixed bugs in search results by default so it makes it tough for people to find bugs that still affect them on the LTS release
14:41 <seb128> bug #1777994
14:42 <ubot5> bug 1777994 in libxcb (Ubuntu Bionic) "the header xcb/xinput.h is missing" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1777994
14:42 <seb128> that one has been uploaded apparently, so setting fix commited
14:42 <seb128> bug #1799614
14:42 <ubot5> bug 1799614 in snapd-glib (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Use new media API" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1799614
14:42 <seb128> assigning that one to Robert
14:43 <seb128> that's it for bionic
14:43 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-tracking-bug-tasks.html
14:43 <seb128> that has the same snapd-glib one for Robert and that's it
14:43 <kenvandine> seb128: robert knows about that and said he would ask about it.
14:44 <seb128> kenvandine, he should assign himself targetted bugs so they don't end up having to be reviewed
14:44 <kenvandine> snapd has an exception and this is to track snapd changes
14:44 <kenvandine> yeah
14:44 <seb128> thx
14:44 <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html
14:45 <seb128> that has bug #1772811 which we already discussed
14:45 <ubot5> bug 1772811 in OEM Priority Project "different behaviors for switch display mode between xenial and bionic" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1772811
14:45 <seb128> and that's it
14:45 <seb128> #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages
14:45 <seb128> Laney, your turn :)
14:45 <Laney> k
14:45 <talx> hello folks, any preseeding guru here ?
14:46 <Laney> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
14:46 <Laney> emacs-common : Breaks: edb (< 1.32) but 1.31-3 is to be installed
14:46 <Laney> good old emacs
14:46 <seb128> talx, hey, we are in the middle of our weekly team meeting, please stand by 10 min or so (or use #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-installer)
14:46 <seb128> I can have a look to emacs/edb
14:47 <talx> seb128, okay would you pme if you can when its over?
14:47 <seb128> talx, sure
14:47 <Laney> there's some archive admin stuff
14:47 <Laney> gnome-control-center/gvfs
14:48 <Laney> and the others need looking at basically
14:48 <seb128> I can deal with the archive admin things
14:49 <seb128> k, let's quickly review/find owners for the other ones
14:49 <seb128> jbicha, gnome-desktop3 ftbfs, are you getting anywhere with that?
14:50 <seb128> or do you need help?
14:50 <seb128> it has been there for almost a week
14:50 <seb128> (imho dealing with breaking from existing uploads should be higher priority than stacking more updates)
14:50 <seb128> tjaalton, is the mesa/armhf ftbfs on your list? (impacts Debian as well I think)
14:51 <jbicha> seb128: gnome-desktop is a brand new test so technically not a regression
14:51 <seb128> network-manbager/ppc64el is annoying, I can try to have a look
14:51 <seb128> jbicha, regression or not it failed to build so that's not going to work
14:51 <seb128> we can't hint/skip ftbfses
14:52 <seb128> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/3.31.90-1ubuntu1
14:52 <tjaalton> seb128: yes, upstream knows
14:52 <jbicha> I was implying we could temporarily skip that broken test until we figure out what's going with Hebrew stuff
14:52 <seb128> tjaalton, ok, thx
14:52 <Laney> is "until" ever going to happen?
14:52 <seb128> jbicha, did you upstream that failure?
14:52 <seb128> do you need help debugging?
14:52 <seb128> let's discuss it here after the meeting
14:53 <seb128> but best to fix rather than skip
14:53 <Laney> yes, I'd like to argue with the notion that tests are OK to ignore just because they're new
14:54 <seb128> +1
14:54 <didrocks> especially if coming to cover a new feature IMHO
14:54 <seb128> k, that's consensus to not skip
14:54 <didrocks> or an experienced regression
14:54 <seb128> let's discuss it in a bit with those interested
14:55 <Laney> I'll look at udisks2 a bit, annoyed that is so bad on ppc64el
14:56 <seb128> librsvg seems like it's green on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gobject-introspection so I guess outdated report
14:56 <seb128> thx Laney
14:56 <seb128> tracker is faiing on armhf/64 , who wants to have a look to that one?
14:57 <seb128> 'Aborted (core dumped)'
14:57 <seb128> looks like a real issue
14:57 <jbicha> seb128: gobject-introspection is very new, I think it may pass if retried
14:58 <seb128> ah, librsvg dropped now after a reload, good :p
14:58 <seb128> jbicha, that isn't on the list?
14:58 <seb128> ah, it's under foundations
14:58 <seb128> well the tracker issue on arm looks real
14:58 <Laney> I retried g-i
14:59 <seb128> hum, in fact from the history seems sometime it's ok
14:59 <seb128> thx Laney
14:59 <Laney> tracker could do with someone looking, yeah
14:59 <seb128> I can try to at least get a bt of that abort and upstream that
14:59 <Laney> could be me but maybe somebody who doesn't normally take these issues might want to look :-)
15:00 <seb128> k
15:01 * Laney coughs
15:01 <seb128> so I think we reviewed the list?
15:01 <seb128> no-one seems to want to step up for tracker :(
15:01 <seb128> maybe we need to start more direct assignements, going to discuss that with willcooke
15:01 <seb128> anyway
15:02 <Laney> team topic for next week
15:02 <seb128> #topic AOB
15:02 <didrocks> thx
15:02 <seb128> yes, good idea
15:02 <Laney> if you're not at the meeting you get to avoid those assignments
15:02 <jbicha> (tracker might just be flaky)
15:02 <seb128> flaky is something worth fixing :)
15:02 <Laney> some people are never at the meeting
15:02 <Laney> indeed
15:04 <seb128> k, 30s for AOB topics
15:05 <seb128> seems not, let's wrap then
15:05 <seb128> thanks team!
15:06 <kenvandine> thanks!
15:06 <seb128> #endmeeting